“Does the employee understand it?”
Knowledge lives in a person's head.
L1 → L5 ON THIS FACE
luck · personal recipe · transferable method · calibrated control · self-renewal
THE ENTERPRISE FRAME · POWERED BY COAGNES
People, processes, and the organisation learn to move with the machine — one algorithm, three carriers of practice, and a shared alphabet for saying where you stand.
Drawn for research with AI as a partner
IN THIS SECTION
§ 1 · THREE CARRIERS
Knowledge about working with AI lives somewhere: in a person's head, in the artefacts of a process, or in an organisation's institutions. The cube asks the same seven dimensions of each carrier — only the subject of the question changes.
“Does the employee understand it?”
Knowledge lives in a person's head.
L1 → L5 ON THIS FACE
luck · personal recipe · transferable method · calibrated control · self-renewal
“Does the process define it, regardless of who performs it?”
Knowledge lives in process artefacts — steps, templates, checkpoints.
L1 → L5 ON THIS FACE
unmanaged · pockets of practice · built into the process · process is measured · self-optimising
“Does the organisation provide and govern it, regardless of the process?”
Knowledge lives in institutions — norms, resources, metrics, training.
L1 → L5 ON THIS FACE
shadow · local initiatives · norm + enablement · managed portfolio · learning organisation
THE VERTICAL IS A LIFECYCLE
Before the request
Truth · Deep — what can be asked, and how to frame it
The request
Connect · Service — context, phrasing, system choice
After the response
Knowledge · Evolution — working the answer, iterating
Cross-cutting
Responsibility — validation spans the whole loop
§ 2 · THE ALPHABET
word = carrier · dimension · level. Position resolves letter collisions: the first letter is always the carrier, the second the dimension, the digit the level. A profile is a vector of 21 words — and levels are never averaged: folding them into one number destroys exactly the diagnostic value the cube exists for.
The rule between L2 and L3 is the model's central line — the articulation threshold: below it a practice dies with its carrier; above it, it can be handed over.
FIG. 02 — READING S·D·L WORDS
§ 3 · CONNECTIVITY LAWS
Projecting the cube onto faces is a deliberate claim of partial independence. The real couplings between carriers are not lost — they are lifted out of the geometry into three explicit laws.
The articulation threshold is the same threshold on every carrier — in a different aggregate state: “I can explain it” (E3) → “it is written into the process” (P3) → “it is anchored as a norm” (O3). Institutionalisation is knowledge moving across carriers, and the L3 column is its ladder.
Configurations with a gap of two or more levels between adjacent carriers of one dimension are unstable and produce predictable pathologies: employees far ahead (E ≫ P, O) breeds shadow practice that leaves with the people; the organisation far ahead (O ≫ P, E) breeds paper maturity — dead regulations. The stable band is a gap of at most one level.
Growth runs as two counter-flows: institutionalisation from below (a personal method becomes a process step becomes a norm) and enablement from above (a policy becomes a regulation becomes a trained employee). A rollout programme manages both flows, not one.
§ 4 · PROVENANCE
The skeleton is borrowed from CMM — the maturity model built at the Software Engineering Institute to judge whether contractors could be trusted with critical work. Its central construction survives the transfer intact: a level is not a score but a mode of existence of a practice. The cube carries that construction from the organisation down to one employee and one working day — then back up, through processes, to the organisation again. The circle closing is the consistency check.
DERIVATION IN FOUR FOLDS
A threshold-first walk through the faces you choose. Each answer scores +1 / −1 evidence and colours the cube as you go. Runs entirely in your browser — nothing is sent anywhere.